What was done
KMSC Law, a century-old full-service firm in Alberta's Peace Country, rolled out Harvey across its commercial and litigation groups. Lawyers use it to review large sets of transaction documents and build chronologies, draft witness questions, summarize transcripts and spot inconsistencies, draft emails, and test arguments. One lawyer used it to compare key terms across hundreds of M&A agreements and schedules and flag issues.
Outcome
Harvey reports that lawyers at the firm save at least 3 to 5 hours a week, with heavy users saving up to 10. One lawyer estimated the M&A review alone saved him about 10 hours in a week. Vendor-reported.
Evidence: Vendor case study. Figures are as reported by the source and have not been independently audited by AgentsNorth.
Prompt Reconstructed by AgentsNorth
The source didn't publish its prompt. This is our reconstruction of a starting prompt for a similar workflow, not the company's actual prompt.
Review the attached agreements and schedules for this transaction. Build a table comparing, for each document: parties, effective date, term, payment terms, termination rights, change-of-control provisions, indemnities, limitation of liability and governing law. Flag any terms that conflict between documents or look unfavourable to our client, citing the document and section. Then list open questions for the client.